Skip to main content

Etihad Law

Creditor Claims in Iraq

This article examines how creditor claims rank in Iraq and how a creditor can use that ranking to build a recovery strategy. When a debtor has enough assets to pay everyone, ranking matters little. When the debtor’s assets are insufficient, ranking determines who is paid, how much and in what order. A creditor that understands where its claim sits relative to others can make better decisions about whether to enforce, negotiate, seek security or join a collective process.

Ranking in Iraq is determined by a combination of general rules in the Civil Code, special privileges granted by legislation and the rights of secured creditors. Because Iraq does not have a single, comprehensive insolvency code, creditors must piece together their position from several sources and assess how those rules apply to the debtor’s particular assets.

The Iraqi Civil Code No. 40 of 1951 sets out the general principle that a debtor’s assets secure its debts, the rules on privileged debts and the rights of creditors holding mortgages and pledges. The Real Estate Registration Law No. 43 of 1971 governs the registration and priority of real estate mortgages. The Execution Law No. 45 of 1980 governs the distribution of proceeds in enforcement. The Labour Law No. 37 of 2015 and tax legislation, including the Income Tax Law No. 113 of 1982, as amended, may give certain claims priority. The bankruptcy provisions retained from the Trade Law No. 149 of 1970 govern distribution in bankruptcy.

Understanding the general principle

As a general rule, all of a debtor’s assets are available to satisfy its debts, and unsecured creditors share equally in proportion to their claims. This principle of equal treatment is modified by security interests, which give a creditor priority over particular assets, and by statutory privileges, which give certain types of claim priority over others.

A creditor should therefore ask three questions: Does my claim have security over specific assets? Does my claim benefit from any statutory privilege? Which other creditors have security or privileges that rank ahead of mine?

Identifying secured claims

Secured creditors have the strongest position. The main forms of security in Iraq include:

  • Mortgages over real estate. Registered with the real estate registry, giving priority over the property according to registration date.
  • Possessory pledges. Pledges in which the creditor or a third party holds the pledged asset, such as equipment, goods or documents of title.
  • Share pledges. Pledges over shares in companies, subject to the Companies Law and the company’s articles.
  • Other arrangements. Assignments of receivables, retention of title and contractual set-off rights, whose effectiveness against other creditors depends on their nature and documentation.

A secured creditor is generally paid from the proceeds of its secured asset before other creditors, up to the amount of its claim. If the proceeds are insufficient, it ranks as an unsecured creditor for the balance. Real estate advice in Iraq can confirm the registration and priority of mortgages.

Understanding privileged claims

Certain claims benefit from statutory privileges that give them priority over ordinary unsecured claims and, in some cases, over secured claims. These typically include judicial and enforcement costs, certain amounts owed to employees for wages, certain taxes and public dues and certain other claims recognised by the Civil Code or special legislation. The precise order among privileged claims, and their relationship to secured claims, depends on the applicable provisions and the nature of the assets.

Creditors should not assume that their security will be unaffected by privileged claims. In practice, employee wage claims and public dues may significantly reduce what is available for others. A careful analysis of the debtor’s obligations to employees and public bodies helps a creditor estimate its likely recovery. Tax advisory services in Iraq can help assess the size of tax claims that may rank ahead.

Assessing the debtor’s assets and other claims

A recovery strategy depends on what the debtor owns and owes. The creditor should identify:

  • Registered assets. Real estate, vehicles and shareholdings, which can usually be verified through official records, together with any recorded encumbrances.
  • Bank accounts and receivables. Funds that can be attached through the execution process.
  • Movable assets. Equipment and inventory, whose value and location may be harder to establish.
  • Competing creditors. Banks, suppliers, employees and authorities, and whether they have security, privileges or pending enforcement.

Choosing a recovery strategy

With an understanding of ranking and assets, the creditor can choose a strategy:

  • Secured enforcement. A secured creditor may enforce against its collateral through the execution directorate, subject to the procedures applicable to the type of security.
  • Early unsecured enforcement. An unsecured creditor may obtain judgment and attach assets quickly, although attachment does not displace the ranking of secured and privileged claims in distribution.
  • Negotiated security. An unsecured creditor may negotiate new security in exchange for forbearance, provided the security is not open to challenge as prejudicial to other creditors.
  • Collective proceedings. Where the debtor is a trader or commercial company in serious difficulty, bankruptcy may ensure an orderly distribution, although at the cost of time and administration.
  • Settlement. A negotiated settlement may produce a faster and more certain recovery than enforcement.

Litigation and dispute resolution advice in Iraq can help select and pursue the most effective route.

Protecting a creditor’s position in advance

The best time to improve ranking is before the debtor runs into difficulty. Creditors extending significant credit should consider taking security, obtaining guarantees, using retention of title, structuring payment through documentary credits and monitoring the debtor’s financial position. Contract terms allowing suspension of supply or early termination on specified warning signs can also limit exposure.

Responding to competing creditors’ actions

Once a debtor’s difficulties become known, other creditors may act quickly. A creditor that delays may find that assets have already been attached or that the debtor has granted security to another creditor. Monitoring the debtor’s position, including court and execution records where accessible, allows a creditor to respond in time.

Where another creditor obtains security or payment shortly before a collapse, the remaining creditors should consider whether the transaction can be challenged as prejudicial. Where several creditors are pursuing the same assets, coordination may produce a better result for all of them than a race to enforce, particularly if competing enforcement would force a sale at a low price. Agreements among creditors on how proceeds will be shared, or a joint approach to the debtor, can sometimes preserve value that individual action would destroy.

Illustrative example. A supplier is owed a large sum by an Iraqi contractor whose main asset is a building mortgaged to a bank. The contractor also owes several months of wages and unpaid taxes. The supplier obtains judgment and attaches the contractor’s bank account, but the balance is small. The building is sold in enforcement by the bank, and the proceeds are applied first to costs and privileged claims, then to the bank’s secured debt. Little remains for the supplier. Recognising this outcome early, the supplier negotiates with the contractor’s main customer to receive a portion of payments due on an ongoing project in exchange for continued supply.

Conclusion & how Etihad Law Firm can help

Recovery in Iraq depends on where a creditor’s claim ranks among secured, privileged and unsecured claims. Understanding that ranking, assessing the debtor’s assets and choosing the right recovery route allow a creditor to maximise its return and avoid wasted effort on enforcement that cannot succeed.

Etihad Law Firm advises creditors on claim ranking, security and recovery strategy in Iraq. Our commercial team can also help creditors structure future credit arrangements to improve their position.